The Shy Writer’s Superpower

How a Pen Name Can Be Your Literary Cloak of Invisibility

The Shy Writer’s Superpower: How a Pen Name Can Be Your Literary Cloak of Invisibility

Let’s face it: being shy is like perpetually feeling like a hermit crab that forgot where it put its shell. You want to peek out, maybe wave a claw at the world, but the moment someone says, “Hey, look at that weird little crab!”—poof—you’re back in hiding, plotting a dramatic exit via the nearest metaphorical tidepool. For writers, this social skittishness can be especially paralyzing. What if your words are judged? What if your inner thoughts, splashed across a page, are met with crickets (or worse, tomatoes)? Enter the pen name: the shy person’s literary invisibility cloak, a.k.a. the ultimate “hold my coffee while I become someone else” power move.

Imagine this: You’ve written something bold, vulnerable, or wildly experimental—a romance novel featuring sentient houseplants, perhaps. The idea of attaching your real name to it makes you break out in a sweat rivaling a sauna session. But slap a pen name on that manuscript? Suddenly, you’re not you anymore. You’re, say, Bartholomew Fernsworth III, a debonair wordsmith who drinks Earl Grey and owns a monocle. Or Luna Starbloom, a reclusive genius who writes by candlelight and communicates only via carrier owl. The pressure evaporates. The real you is safe, sipping tea in pajamas, while your alter ego takes the heat (or the glory).

Pen names aren’t just for Witness Protection Program alumni or 19th-century female authors dodging sexist publishers (looking at you, George Eliot). They’re a cheeky workaround for the anxiety of exposure. Writing under a pseudonym is like attending a masquerade ball where no one knows you’re the person who accidentally microwaved a spoon last Tuesday. You’re free to be messy, daring, or downright bizarre—because if the world hates it, *Bartholomew* is the fall guy, not you.

But here’s the twist: pen names don’t just protect your ego; they can also unleash your creativity. Shyness often shackles us to “safe” choices—writing what we think others want, rather than what makes our weird little hearts sing. A pen name acts as a creative witness protection program, letting you explore genres you’d never touch under your real name. Always wanted to write a thriller about a time-traveling barista? Go nuts—just credit Chuck Steamspresso. Secretly crafting haikus about alien cats? Zorgon Fluffington has your back. The alter ego isn’t just a shield; it’s a permission slip to play.

Of course, maintaining a pen name requires some finesse. You’ll need to commit to the bit without going full Talented Mr. Ripley. No need to rent a fake mustache or invent an elaborate backstory involving amnesia and a yacht accident. Keep it simple: choose a name that feels empowering (or at least doesn’t make you cringe), set up a separate email account, and maybe avoid mentioning your double life to your nosy aunt Carol. The goal isn’t to become a fugitive—it’s to create a psychological buffer between your art and your anxiety.

And let’s not forget the sheer fun of it. A pen name lets you dabble in reinvention, like a literary Madonna (minus the cone bra). You could be a mysterious one-hit wonder, a prolific ghostwriter, or even “retire” your pseudonym dramatically after a scandalous tell-all. The possibilities are as endless as your imagination—and isn’t that the point?

So, to my fellow shy scribes: grab a pen name like it’s a get-out-of-judgment-free card. Write fearlessly, edit ruthlessly, and let your alter ego handle the spotlight. After all, the world deserves your words, even if they arrive gift-wrapped in a pseudonym. And who knows? Maybe one day, you’ll realize you were the bold, brilliant author all along—shell or no shell.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have a date with my typewriter and my nom de plume, Sir Waffles McScribbleton. His fans await.

---

WinWin

by Liz Dubelman

WinWin (a continuing story read here or read the summary below)

Summary:

Betty, a broke, audacious 60-year-old, blows her savings on a doomed fling with a younger man, Tony. Desperate, she cycles through absurd gigs—dog-walking a delusional client’s “talking” dog, house-sitting a mansion (and wrecking it), selling pickles—all hilariously crashing. Undeterred, she launches WinWin, a vigilante app pairing terminally ill users with “targets” (corrupt CEOs, lobbyists) to ethically(?) improve society.

The app goes viral, dubbed “Tinder for assassins,” attracting investors, DOJ scrutiny, and Tony’s slander lawsuit. After a high-profile user assassinates a CEO, WinWin becomes a cultural battleground. Betty battles media firestorms, a rogue “dark mode” knockoff, and an undercover cop sting.

The Reckoning

The courtroom buzzed like a beehive that had just discovered espresso. The judge cleared his throat and declared, “WinWin’s platform is about as legally sound as a Jenga tower in a hurricane. But technically, it’s not a crime to matchmake for morally ambiguous heroics. So, carry on—but with more paperwork.”

Betty’s poker face held, though internally she was already drafting a How to Loophole Your Legacy TED Talk. Sheila leaned over, muttering, “Congrats. You’ve officially turned ethics into a choose-your-own-adventure book.”

Outside, reporters swarmed. Betty adjusted her blazer—a thrift-store power move—and deadpanned, “This ruling proves society’s ready to outsource its karma. WinWin isn’t chaos; it’s… crowd-sourced justice. With merch.” She flashed a teaser slide: WinWin 2.0: Now With Posthumous NFTs.

The headlines wrote themselves: “Court to Betty: ‘Stop, But Also, Please Continue.’”

Rebranding the Revolution (But Make It Fashion)

Regulators demanded oversight. Betty complied by launching WinWin: Bureaucracy Edition™—a platform where users could “ethically” annoy lobbyists via AI-generated complaint letters and glitter bombs. The new slogan? Empowering Legacies (and Lawyers).

“This is compliance?” Sheila hissed, staring at a user’s plan to mail 10,000 googly-eyed rubber ducks to a fossil fuel CEO.

“It’s malicious compliance,” Betty corrected, sipping a martini. “Also, ducks are non-violent. Look it up.”

Downloads ticked upward. Betty celebrated by dropping a limited-edition “Live Bold. Sue Hard.” hoodie.

The Curveball (Or, How Betty Weaponized Irony)

When a rogue dark mode knockoff leaked—DieDie: For People Who Hate Subtlety—Betty livestreamed a mock product roast. “Why settle for edgy when you can be legally distinct?” she quipped, unveiling WinWin: Verified, which offered users “ethical impact receipts” and a partnership with Whistleblowers Without Borders.

The media, torn between outrage and admiration, crowned her “Silicon Valley’s Queen of Chaotic Good.” Sheila sighed. “You’ve turned scandal into a marketing funnel.”

“Darling,” Betty said, adjusting her cat-eye glasses, “scandal is the funnel.”

A Legacy Uncontained (And Unapologetically Messy)

Years later, Betty’s office resembled a meme collage: framed subpoenas, a “Don’t Let Your Dreams Be Subpoenaed” poster, and a Nobel Peace Prize nomination (revoked, but “it’s the thought that counts”).

Sheila barged in, waving a whiskey bottle. “To survival?”

“To spite,” Betty countered, clinking glasses. Her phone pinged—a new match: A 24-year-old hacker with a vendetta against tax havens. Target: A yacht named “Debt Collector.”

“Kids these days,” Betty smirked. “So efficient.”

Sheila groaned. “You’re a menace.”

“And you’re my enabler,” Betty shot back, tossing her a glitter-encrusted resignation letter. “Now, let’s go crash a gala. I hear the caviar’s ethically sourced.”

In Betty’s Wikipedia, it stated: “Some referred to her as a villain, while others saw her as a visionary. Betty? She preferred to call herself a ‘work in progress.’”